FormFlect

What the evidence says.
And what FormFlect does about it.

Fitness is full of confident claims. Below are the ones that shape how FormFlect works, each graded against peer-reviewed research — including the popular claims we deliberately left out. Where the evidence is mixed, we say so.

Strong consistent trials / meta-analyses   Mixed plausible, inconsistent or context-dependent   Animal / mechanistic not shown in humans at useful scale   Contradicted by better evidence

Energy balance and counting

“Calorie counting doesn’t work.”
Mixed

Energy balance itself is not in dispute. The useful part of the claim is about the tool: self-reported intake is under-recorded by 20–40% even in motivated people (Lichtman 1992; doubly-labelled-water studies), food labels may legally deviate by up to 20%, and adherence to logging collapses within weeks for most users. Structured tracking does beat no tracking in trials — but it is an unreliable, unpleasant proxy, not a wrong one.

FormFlect: no calorie counting. Intake is controlled through protein targets, meal structure and a slow, measured weight trend — the deficit is verified by outcome, not arithmetic.
“Dieting makes you hungrier; the weight comes back.”
Strong

Leptin falls and ghrelin rises in a deficit; appetite hormones remain shifted a year after weight loss (Sumithran 2011). Most dieters regain within 2–5 years.

FormFlect: maintenance is part of the programme from day one — slow rate, planned maintenance weeks, no “finish line”.
“My metabolism slowed down.”
Strong

Mostly true, but not in the way people mean: the large effect is a 200–400 kcal/day fall in non-exercise activity (NEAT) during a diet (Levine; Rosenbaum & Leibel). Adaptive thermogenesis beyond that is real but smaller.

FormFlect: a step floor that holds through the diet — the single best counter to the NEAT drop.

Muscle, protein and rate of loss

“Keep the muscle while losing fat.”
Strong

Fat-free mass is the main determinant of resting energy expenditure, and its loss predicts post-diet overeating (Dulloo). Preserving it is the best-supported lever for keeping weight off.

FormFlect: lean mass preserved is the north-star metric, not kilos lost.
“Don’t lose more than 0.5–1% of body weight a week.”
Strong

Slower loss preserves lean mass better in athletes (Garthe 2011) and general populations; 0.5–1%/week is the consensus coaching range.

FormFlect: the rate governor — smoothed daily weigh-ins; too fast and the app adds food, too slow and it tightens.
“Protein is the dietary lever for muscle.”
Strong

1.6–2.4 g/kg/day during a deficit preserves lean mass (Morton 2018 meta-analysis; Helms 2014 for lean individuals).

FormFlect: protein is the one thing we count, per meal, with a daily target by body weight and mode.
“Lifting protects muscle and improves insulin sensitivity.”
Strong

Resistance training in a deficit is the strongest protector of lean mass (Sardeli 2018); it improves glycaemic control comparably to aerobic work (Umpierre 2011). Contraction-driven glucose uptake is insulin-independent.

FormFlect: two to three coached lifting sessions a week are the programme’s backbone.
“Exercise doesn’t make you lose weight.”
Strong

Exercise-only interventions produce modest loss (people compensate); but high activity is the strongest correlate of keeping weight off (National Weight Control Registry).

FormFlect: training is for muscle and maintenance; the app never shows a “calories burned” figure.
“On GLP-1 drugs, a lot of the weight lost is muscle.”
Strong framing

DXA sub-studies found ~39% of semaglutide weight loss was lean mass (which includes water, organ tissue and bone, not only muscle) — a proportion similar to fast diet-induced loss without resistance training. Older adults are at real risk of irreversible bone and muscle loss.

FormFlect: GLP-1 companion mode — protein to the top of the band and lifting, as lifestyle support alongside the prescriber.

Carbohydrates, sugar and fat distribution

“Frequent eating keeps insulin high; fast to burn fat.”
Mixed

Controlled feeding studies show no fat-loss advantage for low-carb at matched calories (Hall 2017, 2021), and time-restricted eating works when it reduces intake — not otherwise (Liu, NEJM 2022).

FormFlect: an optional eating window, offered honestly as a snack-killer, with eligibility checks. No “insulin” claims.
“Sugar drives liver fat.”
Strong magnitude

Excess fructose in a calorie surplus raises liver fat via de novo lipogenesis (Schwarz 2015); isocaloric swaps show smaller effects. Fatty liver prevalence is roughly 30–38% of adults globally.

FormFlect: sugary drinks and packaged snacks are the first thing the app asks you to remove; added sugar is tracked against a ~25 g/day guide.
“You can target belly fat.”
Contradicted

Spot reduction does not occur (Vispute 2011). Visceral fat does, however, go early in overall fat loss.

FormFlect: waist circumference as a monthly proxy; no “belly workouts”.

Sleep, stress and caffeine

“Short sleep wrecks your metabolism.”
Strong

One night of four hours’ sleep reduces insulin sensitivity by ~20–25% (Donga 2010); chronic short sleep raises hunger and intake, and sleep extension reduces intake (Tasali 2022).

FormFlect: sleep is one of the five numbers; the coach flags a short night and the afternoon craving it brings.
“Cut caffeine to fix insulin resistance.”
Contradicted as a rule

Acute caffeine reduces insulin sensitivity in lab studies (Keijzers 2002), but habitual coffee consumption is associated with lower type-2 diabetes risk across 28 cohorts (Ding 2014), and tolerance develops. Caffeine 30–60 min before training improves performance.

FormFlect: no caffeine-cutting. The one rule is timing — none within ~8–9 h of bed (Drake 2013) — framed as a sleep tool.
“Delay your morning coffee to avoid a cortisol spike.”
Mixed → not adopted

The cortisol awakening response is normal physiology; no trial shows a benefit from delaying caffeine 90 minutes.

FormFlect: coffee on waking is fine; before an early session it helps.
“Fasting triggers autophagy and repair.”
Animal / mechanistic

Robust in rodents. In humans there is no validated non-invasive marker and no dosing data; any energy deficit (and exercise) upregulates autophagy — fasting is not special for it.

FormFlect: no autophagy claims, anywhere.

Fuelling around training

“Eat carbs and protein before training.”
Strong

Carbohydrate plus protein 30–90 min before resistance training improves performance and blunts the exercise cortisol rise and muscle-protein breakdown (Bird 2006; Tipton 2001; ISSN position stand, Kerksick 2017). Fasted training gives no fat-loss advantage (Schoenfeld 2014) and costs performance in longer sessions (Aird 2018). Close to the session, low fat and fibre digest better.

FormFlect: a pre-training prompt an hour before your usual session — yoghurt and berries or toast and nut butter at 45–90 min; a banana inside 30.
“You must eat within 30 minutes after training.”
Contradicted

The post-exercise “anabolic window” is hours wide, and total daily protein matters more than timing (Aragon & Schoenfeld 2013). Protein, 20–40 g, is the part that matters (Morton 2018); rapid carbohydrate refuelling only matters if you train again within ~8 hours.

FormFlect: post-session prompt for protein within a couple of hours — a banana alone is carbs; pair it.
Our standard. Every behaviour FormFlect coaches traces to a line above. Popular claims graded Mixed, Animal-only or Contradicted are not in the app, however often they are repeated. We review this page as the literature moves; if you think we have something wrong, write to hello@formflect.app with the paper.

References